Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: jory2 Date: Apr 26, 2013 9:52am
Forum: web Subject: Re: Concerned that my blog has been added to your archive

jezta,
I think what's most important (Copyright / Intellectual Property Laws included) is this statement:

"I have also noticed that a number of views from the US and Canada have no referral information. It would appear that my site has been "crawled" several times since March 2012. Unfortunately I'm not happy with the situation as I was not asked if I wanted this to happen, even though there are contact details and a clear statement on my blog that I do not want my work shared in this way."

The Internet Archive is not a legal deposit, it is a private corporation. It does not have the legal permission to make permanent copies, store, republish, and then disseminated to millions of people, on a daily basis, the Works of others that are copyright protected.

Respect for the Rights of others really isn't that difficult.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: jezta Date: Apr 26, 2013 10:10am
Forum: web Subject: Re: Concerned that my blog has been added to your archive


I do not understand what you mean?

Are you suggesting that the WBM is illegal?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: jory2 Date: Apr 26, 2013 10:19am
Forum: web Subject: Re: Concerned that my blog has been added to your archive

I'm not "suggesting" anything, it's matter of fact really.
The WBM is ran, owned and operated by a private company, it crawls the net, copies entire websites, stores the content and then serves up content owned by other people all without permission. Illegal? Seriously?

"The Internet Archive said, “Internet Archive has no interest in including materials in the Wayback Machine of persons who do not wish to have their Web content archived. We recognize that Ms. Shell has a valid and enforceable copyright in her Web site and we regret that the inclusion of her Web site in the Wayback Machine resulted in this litigation."
http://archive.org/post/119669/lawsuit-settled

All could have been avoided if the WBM asked for permission, or at the very least respected the laws and the owner Rights.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: jezta Date: Apr 26, 2013 10:35am
Forum: web Subject: Re: Concerned that my blog has been added to your archive

So call the cops, then!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: PDpolice Date: Apr 26, 2013 5:29pm
Forum: web Subject: Re: Concerned that my blog has been added to your archive

Jezta,
You seem like a poster I could enjoy.
I believe the depth of xoryx's bravery in action was covered in past posts. Do a search on either that name above or of The Nodnix for details.
AlbertinaMcNeill, sorry you feel wronged but two other known server farms and one governmental agency are currently doing a similar cache of all websites. Just because the big "G" oogle one does not advertise it, you can still find their cached search button if you try.
It you put it out, it will stick.